This system may seem deceptively simple in design, but remember,
we’re only dealing with two possible outcomes, where any decision
must be either “A” or “B”. It does not take a complex formula to beat
such a game.
We are able to gain our advantage, not by trying to predict something
that is, by all means Random, but by betting AGAINST a selected
pattern that has proven to be improbable and unlikely to occur in a
random distribution of results.
Flat Bet Strategy
This is how I play and do very well. Winning shoes are usually
between +3 and +8. Best win was +14. Worst losing shoe was -11.
Since playing that shoe, I’ve started using a stop loss of -7. 3 out of 4
shoes are winners, making it easy to quit any session (2-5 shoes) with
a nice profit. A 50-unit bankroll is more than you should ever need.
Here are the rules--
Bet against a pattern of 1-2-3. Example: B-PP-BBB or P-BB-PPP.
Whatever the first hand is (B or P), you follow the same side to
prevent a single 1. If you win the bet, follow the side for as long as it
goes. If you lost the 1st bet, now you have 1-1 and would bet against
the hand that won to prevent 1-2. If you lost that bet, you would
follow the side of the 2 for as long as it goes. If you won against the 1-
1, you still have 1-1 and you continue to bet opposite to keep the 2nd
1 from becoming a 2. Continue betting for the zig-zag, for as long as it
continues. It will always end as 1-2 and you will follow the 2 for as
long as it goes. If the 1-2 becomes 1-2-1, you bet opposite to prevent 1-
2-3. If you win the 1st or 2nd bet to prevent the 3, from happening,
follow that side for as long as it goes. If you lose all 3 bets to prevent
the 3, follow the 3 for as long as it goes.
If you have 1-2-1 you bet opposite to prevent going to 3 and win, you
follow
as long as it goes, but if you won the opposite to prevent the 3, but
then
lost the very next bet, you would have 1-2-1-1 and have either the
beginning
of a new 1-2-3 or it could be interpreted as 1-1 and you "could" bet
against
the 2nd 1 becoming a 2. (I am playing that the 2nd 1 is the beginning
of a
new 1-2-3 and I am following the side of the last 1.)
Aggressive Strategy
This is how my friend plays. The Aggressive Strategy has never lost
but sometimes you get into some very big bets before it recovers. The
Aggressive Strategy requires a bankroll of 500 units.
Here are the rules--
First we change the selected pattern to one that, as far as we know, has
never occurred. The pattern we use in the Aggressive Strategy is 1-1-
2-2-3-3-4. Example: B-P-BB-PP-BBB-PPP-BBBB or P-B-PP-BBPPP-
BBB-PPPP.
Second, we use a modified version of the Cancellation Money
Management System. This is a little hard to explain so I’ll use a lot of
examples. As in the Conservative Strategy, we’re betting AGAINST
our selected pattern. We record our bets in columns. Our first bet is
only made after recording the last (most recent) decision. We then
bet AGAINST a 1-1, so we bet that the next decision will be the
SAME as the last one. Our first bet is always 2 units:
11
If we win this bet we cross out both 1’s (2 units of profit) and begin
again.
-1- (new series)> 1
-1- 1
+2
If we lose our first bet in a series, we add the total of the bet (in this
case “2”) to the bottom of our column
112
but we continue to bet only the total of the top two numbers:
1
1 >> Bet = 2 units
2
If we lose again, we add the total of our losing bet to the bottom of
our column
1122
and continue to bet the total of the top two numbers:
1
1 >> Bet = 2 units
22
Betting in this manner, we are not raising our bet in a losing streak.
We are flat betting as we lose and will only ever raise our bet after a
win cancels out the top two numbers.
Let’s say we win our next bet. We would cross out our top two
numbers and bet the total of the next two numbers:
-1-
-1-
2
2 >> Bet = 4 units
This betting strategy is ingenious! It’s power lies in the fact that,
once you are behind, every ONE WIN cancels out TWO LOSSES! It
recovers very quickly.
That is how simple and easy this system is. Most testing has been
done on the Baccarat tables, as this game offers us the lowest house
percentage, the game moves at a nice pace, the tables and chairs are
comfortable, etc. In testing, it also won easily against Single Zero
Roulette (hard to find in the US) and Craps (sometimes very slow
between decisions and you have to stand).
Franci,
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기